Author Topic: 3dmark3 (Read 7986 times)

n1c · « **on:** September 15, 2002, 06:00:34 PM »

Here are 2 good Benchmark utilities

DL here and post your score

3DMARK2001 Second Edition (build 330)

PCMARK2002

n1c · « **Reply #1 on:** September 15, 2002, 06:05:29 PM »

PC Mark =

CPU= 2508
Memory= 1773
HDD= 534

3D Mark =

Date = 2002-09-15
CPU = Intel Pentium III 933 MHz
GPU = ATI Radeon 8500
OS = Microsoft Windows XP SP1
Res = 1024x768 32bit
Score = 6429

opiesilver · « **Reply #2 on:** September 15, 2002, 10:50:41 PM »

PC Mark =

CPU= 4892
Memory= 3307
HDD= 888

3D Mark =

Date = 2002-09-15
CPU= AMD Athlon XP 2000+
GPU= NVIDA GeForce4 Ti 4400
OS= Microsoft Windows XP Pro SP1
RES= 1024x768 32bit
Score= 10023

Boomslang · « **Reply #3 on:** September 16, 2002, 04:35:19 PM »

PC Mark
CPU= 6363
Memory= 6451
HDD= 1135
3D Mark= 10585

ut 2003 bot 1024 x 768 57.5 fps
flyby 107.3

P4 253
512 PC2700 ocsys cas 2 1T
1024 x 768 32bit
ATI 8500 @ 290/300

[Edited on 2-26-2003 by Boomslang]

n1c · « **Reply #4 on:** October 24, 2002, 01:14:14 AM »

He should have gotten the better video card

New 1.4 Athlon
Chaintech MOBO
256 DDR ram
CHEAP number 9 32 MB video card

[3D Mark2001] Score, 880

"I'll have to pokearound at things a bit"

I found this In This forum of 3D Mark2001 scores

[Edited on 1-4-2003 by Dragon Master]

n1c · « **Reply #5 on:** January 04, 2003, 12:50:45 AM »

Well I retested my stuff and here it is. . .

PC Mark

CPU: 4550
Mem: 2569
HDD: 996!!! At ATA 100

3D Mark

7798
with
P3 1.482
512 cas 2 Ram
ATI 8500 64meg oc at 285/279

opiesilver · « **Reply #6 on:** January 11, 2003, 12:14:29 AM »

Just upgraded to an AMD XP 2100+, and DDR 333. Here are my new stats:

PC Mark

CPU 5060
Memory 3219
HD 773

3D Mark 10230

Not quite the changes I really expected. I thought there be be an increase of about 3%. I'm going to have to double check all my connections and jumpers.

Spade · « **Reply #7 on:** January 14, 2003, 08:29:08 AM »

Interesting to say the least, I will post my results before and after XP, I think from what I am seeing that my machine should be in the 10,000 range and right now I am around 8700. More to come.

Wolverine of Ambush! · « **Reply #8 on:** January 14, 2003, 01:38:28 PM »

"If I only had THE (vid) card" - Wizard of Oz

ZWarrior · « **Reply #9 on:** January 14, 2003, 03:32:47 PM »

"If I only had the funds. :;(: "
-- ZWarrior

Boomslang · « **Reply #10 on:** February 12, 2003, 02:31:38 PM »

must read:

"3DMark03 combines custom artwork with a custom rendering engine that creates a set of demo scenes that, while pretty, have very little to do with actual games. It is much better termed a demo than a benchmark. The examples included in this report illustrate that 3DMark03 does not represent games, can never be used as a stand-in for games, and should not be used as a gamers’ benchmark."

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/story.html?id=1045073804

[Edited on 2-12-2003 by Boomslang]

Morpheus · « **Reply #11 on:** February 19, 2003, 10:49:14 AM »

Editorial at Tom's on 3dmark 03

Well, it continues.....

I think nVidia is afraid.:;(:

n1c · « **Reply #12 on:** February 19, 2003, 02:23:12 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Morpheus
Editorial at Tom's on 3dmark 03

Well, it continues.....

I think nVidia is afraid.:;(:

As well as they should be!!! Because Nvidiot Sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!

ZWarrior · « **Reply #13 on:** February 19, 2003, 04:09:57 PM »

Careful, ATI isn't THAT much better than nVidia. The battle rages, and the victor is not clear yet.

I love a competitive market, it means that we the consumer win the most!:D

n1c · « **Reply #14 on:** February 19, 2003, 07:42:14 PM »

ATI grafix alone are and always have been better Than Nvidiot

Morpheus · « **Reply #15 on:** February 20, 2003, 09:09:34 AM »

At this point the casual eye, and even the not so casual eye cannot tell the difference in quality. Only when you freeze the screen and spend 5 minutes analyzing it do you notice issues.

I've had an ATI 7200 64mb DDR VIVO card, and a gForce 4 TI4200. The only difference I have noticed is my machine doesn't crash nearly as often with the nVidia card as it did with the ATI. In fact i don't think I've had a crash as a result of video since I upgraded. Oh and of course I noticed faster frame rates, but that's expected.

At this point in the game the winner is the consumer. The company who can produce the best graphics for the least amount of money will gain market share until the competition brings out something better and cheaper. Both companies are viable (have strong financials), and will be able to stand strong. The fact that ATI has been able to be on "top" and may continue to for the forseable future is a great thing. I would expect nVidia to invest in inovation and R&D and to come out on top hopefully in a year or two. That will provide consumers with the best pricing, furthers technology, and improves the economy.

The bottom line is without nVidia, ATI wouldn't be as strong, and without ATI nVidia wouldn't be as strong. Neither is "better" in and of itself.

Boomslang · « **Reply #16 on:** February 20, 2003, 03:24:05 PM »

Better get new glasses, I think I have some pop bottles if you want them.

Morpheus · « **Reply #17 on:** February 20, 2003, 04:27:27 PM »

Yuck Yuck Yuck

Boomslang · « **Reply #18 on:** February 21, 2003, 02:19:06 PM »

loaded 3dmark3 DX 9 3.1 cat drivers to run the benchmark got a 1236. Lost 500 points off my 3dmark2001. I went back to DX8.1a and the old drivers.

[Edited on 2-21-2003 by Boomslang]

ZWarrior · « **Reply #19 on:** August 16, 2005, 08:15:06 AM »

Loaded 3DMark '05 and ran it with my base system no tweaks:

3D marks: 2080
CPU Marks: 2939
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1127159

Mr_Anderson · « **Reply #20 on:** August 16, 2005, 04:09:04 PM »

This was my first time using it and I got this.

3D marks: 4276
CPU Marks: 4475

JollyRoger · « **Reply #21 on:** August 17, 2005, 09:52:33 AM »

I affraid what of doing an '05 on myself, but here it goes.

[Edited on 8-17-2005 by JollyRoger]

Mr_Anderson · « **Reply #22 on:** August 17, 2005, 05:26:33 PM »

And the results are??

Boomslang · « **Reply #23 on:** August 17, 2005, 06:02:35 PM »

3D marks: 5486

PCmark

CPU Marks: 4812

Mr_Anderson · « **Reply #24 on:** October 01, 2005, 10:56:53 PM »

Durring the lan party, Papa Smurf showed me a website that had some OS tweaks and I ended up turning off a whole bunch of things that I did not need.

My results from 3DMark05:

3DMark Score: 5953

CPU Score: 4926

News:

Recent Posts

Fiction

Permissions

Author Topic: 3dmark3 (Read 7986 times)